Rupert Swarbrick wrote:
Peter Van Eynde <pvane...@debian.org>
writes:
After some consideration I must conclude that the state of the Common
Lisp packages in Debian is becoming unreasonable. One of the goals of
forming the pkg-common-lisp team was that I would not be a
bottleneck, as RL is inflicting more and more damage to my 'Debian
playtime'.
Now that Luca left I'm basically the only 'active' (for very small
values of active) DD/DM left. (no hard feeling towards anybody, just
loads of thanks for the work they did)
I see two alternatives:
* other people get involved, investigating bugs and sending
git/darcs/whatever format patches.
* we go low impact and remove common-lisp-controller and all
Common Lisp libraries, and I/we only package the lisp
implementations (clisp, ecl, sbcl, cmucl and perhaps ccl) without
any special changes
I don't expect the first alternative to be realistic, so unless
proven wrong I'll RFA/RM all the libraries/clc on the 5th of
September.
Hi folks,
I am currently somewhat on the team but have not done anything. The
main issue I have is darcs, I just find it waay to problematic to use.
If the packages were moved to say git or svn I might be able to pick up
some of the slack (though I am no lisp expert by any stretch :( ).
Thanks,
Barry deFreese
_______________________________________________
pkg-common-lisp-devel mailing list
pkg-common-lisp-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-common-lisp-devel
