On May 6, 2014 3:17:01 PM EDT, Andreas Cadhalpun <[email protected]> wrote: >Hi Scott, > >On 04.05.2014 20:31, Scott Kitterman wrote: >> On May 4, 2014 2:07:11 PM EDT, Andreas Cadhalpun ><[email protected]> wrote: >>> On 04.05.2014 17:26, Scott Kitterman wrote: >>>> On May 4, 2014 5:44:47 AM EDT, Andreas Cadhalpun >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> On 03.05.2014 01:05, Scott Kitterman wrote: >>>>> I'm not familiar with the different *bsd's, but I guess that >kfreebsd >>>>> is not that different from freebsd, so we could try to enable JIT >on >>>>> kfreebsd by adding it to that list. >>>>> >>>>> What's your opinion? >>>> >>>> In general, I'm in favor. >>> >>> OK. >> >> Right. Got confused. Let's try it. I can access porter boxes to >test. > >I have installed Debian/kfreebsd-amd64 (jessie) in a VirtualBox. >Then I built clamav with the following change on top of the aca_llvm >branch: >--- a/libclamav/c++/configure.ac >+++ b/libclamav/c++/configure.ac >@@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ if test "$enable_llvm" = "auto"; then > case "$target_cpu" in > i?86|amd64|x86_64|powerpc*) > case "$target_os" in >- >darwin*|freebsd*|openbsd*|netbsd*|dragonfly*|linux*|solaris*|win32*|mingw*) >+ >darwin*|freebsd*|kfreebsd*|openbsd*|netbsd*|dragonfly*|linux*|solaris*|win32*|mingw*) > AC_MSG_RESULT([ok ($target_cpu-$target_os)]) > ;; > *) > >It built successfully, so I think this can be enabled. > >What do you think about merging aca_llvm to unstable now? > >It would probably make sense to upload these changes together with the >new upstream version 0.98.2.
Agreed. Make sure to adjust debian rules and control. Scott K _______________________________________________ Pkg-clamav-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-clamav-devel
