Hi Scott,
On 04.05.2014 20:31, Scott Kitterman wrote:
On May 4, 2014 2:07:11 PM EDT, Andreas Cadhalpun
<[email protected]> wrote:
On 04.05.2014 17:26, Scott Kitterman wrote:
On May 4, 2014 5:44:47 AM EDT, Andreas Cadhalpun
<[email protected]> wrote:
On 03.05.2014 01:05, Scott Kitterman wrote:
I'm not familiar with the different *bsd's, but I guess that kfreebsd
is not that different from freebsd, so we could try to enable JIT on
kfreebsd by adding it to that list.
What's your opinion?
In general, I'm in favor.
OK.
Right. Got confused. Let's try it. I can access porter boxes to test.
I have installed Debian/kfreebsd-amd64 (jessie) in a VirtualBox.
Then I built clamav with the following change on top of the aca_llvm branch:
--- a/libclamav/c++/configure.ac
+++ b/libclamav/c++/configure.ac
@@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ if test "$enable_llvm" = "auto"; then
case "$target_cpu" in
i?86|amd64|x86_64|powerpc*)
case "$target_os" in
-
darwin*|freebsd*|openbsd*|netbsd*|dragonfly*|linux*|solaris*|win32*|mingw*)
+
darwin*|freebsd*|kfreebsd*|openbsd*|netbsd*|dragonfly*|linux*|solaris*|win32*|mingw*)
AC_MSG_RESULT([ok ($target_cpu-$target_os)])
;;
*)
It built successfully, so I think this can be enabled.
What do you think about merging aca_llvm to unstable now?
It would probably make sense to upload these changes together with the
new upstream version 0.98.2.
Best regards,
Andreas
_______________________________________________
Pkg-clamav-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-clamav-devel
