On 2019-02-20 07:36:48, Den wrote: > > Given the discussion below, I think we'll make piglit a sub-project of > > mesa. Those who need commit access to piglit but not mesa can be > > added directly to the piglit project. > > Hi list. > > Since piglit was also moved to the gitlab, same with mesa, our team is > interested in process workflow for contributing to it. Before (again, > same with mesa) we created mailing threads and after reviewing test was > pushed to master by somebody with access. > Now mesa got a new possibility for reviewing - merge requests, which > doesn't exist in piglit. Also, according to Jason's conclusion, anybody > can request commit access to piglit. But in this case how the review > process will be done?
I notice that no one replied to Den with concern about using merge requests for piglit. Several of us discussed this yesterday, and it seems even more useful for the piglit project to use merge requests than Mesa. Therefore, I enabled merge requests on the piglit project. If no one objects, then I think we should document it on the piglit webpage. Does anyone have concerns about this plan? -Jordan _______________________________________________ Piglit mailing list Piglit@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/piglit
