Jason Ekstrand <ja...@jlekstrand.net> writes: > All, > > Sorry for the mess of GitLab e-mails but there are a lot of questions to > ask as this process moves forward. Today, we're discussing piglit. I've > included both the mesa and piglit list in the hopes that people will > actually see this e-mail. > > Honestly, I expect the migration of piglit to have much less impact on most > people's daily lives than moving the mesa repo. > > The biggest question I have is whether we actually want to continue to have > a separate "piglit" group. With GitLab, we can already give someone > developer access to piglit without giving them developer access to mesa. > Mostly, this is a question of whether we consider piglit to be it's own > project on freedesktop or a sub-project of mesa. I don't know the answer > to that question.
So far, having it be a separate group has just been a pain in getting people to contribute to piglit, when we mistakenly forget to add mesa devs to it. I don't think we need it to be a separate committer group.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Piglit mailing list Piglit@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/piglit
