Quoting Andres Gomez (2016-11-10 01:06:57) > On Wed, 2016-11-09 at 14:56 -0800, Dylan Baker wrote: > > Bump. > > > > Anyone interested in this? > > > > > > As commented, although this is not a definitive solution I suppose this > can help in the meanwhile. > > I'm sorry I didn't contribute a follow up. I got tangled in other tasks > and never found time to get to it. > > In any case, my idea was to reduce the amount of tested cases since I > think right now there are probably many tests that check very similar > inputs. Additionally, I was thinking on something like this for the > quick profile so this works for me.
That might be a better short term solution than this patch, since it shouldn't be that hard to do, unlike a C test that would take someone an investment of time to create. I think in the short term I'll land this to make quick.py quicker, it's not very invasive and we can remove it easily enough. > > However, maybe a C test could be a better idea, dunno. > > From my side, this is: > > Reviewed-by: Andres Gomez <[email protected]> Thanks! Dylan
signature.asc
Description: signature
_______________________________________________ Piglit mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/piglit
