This causes an assert failure in mesa and it doesn't seem like this test is designed for depth/stencil formats.
Signed-off-by: Ilia Mirkin <[email protected]> --- Ian, I know you're rewriting half these tests... feel free to fold this into your series if you like. tests/spec/arb_direct_state_access/gettextureimage-formats.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tests/spec/arb_direct_state_access/gettextureimage-formats.c b/tests/spec/arb_direct_state_access/gettextureimage-formats.c index e2d637c..ce25205 100644 --- a/tests/spec/arb_direct_state_access/gettextureimage-formats.c +++ b/tests/spec/arb_direct_state_access/gettextureimage-formats.c @@ -462,7 +462,8 @@ supported_format_set(const struct test_desc *set) set->format == ext_packed_depth_stencil || set->format == arb_texture_rg_int || set->format == arb_depth_texture || - set->format == arb_depth_buffer_float) { + set->format == arb_depth_buffer_float || + set->format == arb_texture_stencil8) { /* * texture_integer requires a fragment shader, different * glTexImage calls. Depth/stencil formats not implemented. -- 2.3.6 _______________________________________________ Piglit mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/piglit
