On Sun, Nov 22, 2020 at 11:49:11AM +0100, Tomas Hlavaty wrote: > it is only mess because you really want to find a loophole
I don't want to find a loophole. I leave everything as it is (MIT/X11). I just want to point out how nonsensical it all is. > otherwise you could use rlwrap as already suggested and call it a day > and you already clearly explained, why rlwrap is not an option iirc Yes. See also my other mail a few minutes ago about the requirements. I would rather re-activate and perhaps rewrite the old lib/led.l > this is what Stallman said to Haible: I don't care what RMS says. He is a docmatic actually *restricting* freedom. ☺/ A!ex -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe
