Mitch Pirtle schrieb: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Thursday 06 February 2003 14:32, Goetz Lohmann wrote: > >>Mitch Pirtle schrieb: >> >>>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >>>Hash: SHA1 >>> >>>On Wednesday 05 February 2003 01:33, Benjamin Tomhave wrote: >>> >>>>Greetings, >>>> >>>>I have a legacy site that has yet to migrated from 4.0.x to 4.3.x era >>>>code. Ergo, I need to install PHP 4.0.6 on RedHat 8.0. >>> >>>Good luck, and please let me know if you ever have any success making ANY >>>version of PHP compile on a RH8 box. I have asked this list several times >>>now if it is even possible, but only get silence - so I am forced to >>>assume that I am not alone with this problem. >> >>maybe no one answer cause nobody know the question, is busy, or just think >>this question isn't worth a line to note ... maybe you could find a >>php-4.3.0 RPM at the link below which mean it is possible to compile it on >>redhat 8 ! > > > The topic posted was that I could not get php-4.3.0 to compile at all, with > any options, on a stock RH8 box which comes with httpd-2.0.40-11. I also > cannot get PEAR to function (although the base PEAR libraries work, I just > cannot use the pear command to install anything else). Sad.
Maybe I think it isn't quite a problem of RH8, cause PHP 4.3.0 is working well (maybe with Apache 1.3.x) ... I'm sorry ... I don't ever wan't to blame somebody but the way I go on such problem is to eleminate the imposibilitys. So in fact if I found a RPM with PHP 4.3.0 for a RH8 box, it must be running on such a box. Ergo it must be a problem to Apache 2 or something else, but not PHP itself. And if somebody isn't answering to a question then most often no one knows an answer to it, didn't ever had such problem, being busy, didn't understand the question or something else ... but this not mean that it's ain't possible to get work ... thats just the way I posted the RPM ... > That was my last question to the list, and I thought I was pretty clear. I > wanted to know, from the php side, if php 4.3 was ever going to work with RH8 > and httpd2; and I vaguely remember being told that it was a problem with gcc > (Stig, was that you?)... So I'm not clear as to if this is a gcc issue, or a > php issue, or a httpd2 issue... In fact that there IS a working PHP with Apache 1.3.x it have to be a problem with Apache 2 APXS .. in that way the developer forum of Apache 2 and PHP might quit more effectiv for your search ! > Then the discussion seemed to digress into an apache1.3-vs-apache2 battle, > which sounded a little too much like emacs-vs-vi to me. So unanswered was > the possibility that it was a problem between php's apache module and > apache2's apxs. I still do not know where the problem is, and am not sure > what it takes to fix it. Apache 2.0.x and PHP 4.3.x are both NEW developments, which may still have some difficultys to operate together. But I'm sure they will in the near future ! Maybe take a look at the developer forum of Apache and PHP ... >>http://rpm.pbone.net/index.php3?stat=4&idpl=324868&idpa=324868 > > Only works with apache 1.3, not 2.0. Which tells me that if I want php-4.3.0 > on a RH8 box, I gotta downgrade httpd. Don't know if this fixes PEAR, might > consider playing with it over the weekend. at this site you might also find the SRC.RPM package wich might help you more to get it working with Apache 2 > Thanks for pointing out the site, though... One more resource to find SRPMS! No problem ... you might also look at http://rpmseek.com/rpm-pl/php.html?hl=de&cs=php:PN:0:0:0 regards, G.Lohmann -- @ Goetz Lohmann, Germany | Web-Developer & Sys-Admin \/ ------------------------------------------------------ () He's the fellow that people wonder what he does and || why the company needs him, until he goes on vacation. -- PHP Install Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
