Dear Cambridge Philosophers of Science,

Tomorrow (Wednesday), 23 November, our CamPoS speaker will be Kirsten 
Walsh from the University of Nottingham (but a frequent visitor here), 
speaking on ‘Newton’s Laws and “Epistemic Amplification”’.  Her abstract 
is below.

Sincerely,
Brian Pitts

Abstract:
Newton claimed his laws of motion are certainly true, and yet his 
justification was surprisingly weak: he merely cited a handful of 
experiments and the ‘agreement of mathematicians’.  Surely then these 
laws are probable at best.  I examine the experimental evidence Newton 
provided and argue that, while this evidence gives strong support for 
the laws in limited cases, and justifies their use in Newton’s 
mathematical system, it does not justify such strong epistemic claims.  
In modern Bayesian terms, we might say that Newton’s laws merit high 
subjective priors.  This does not make them certain.  I then suggest 
that Newton’s laws earn epistemic warrant in another way: via a process 
I call ‘epistemic amplification’.  On this account, Newton’s laws, as 
the axioms of the theory, gain epistemic status by virtue of the 
theory’s success.  In some places, this looks like straightforward 
confirmation: since the motions of the planets confirm Newton’s theory, 
they must also confirm the laws.  But in other cases, Newton’s 
mathematical model seems to provide a crucial test of the laws.  I 
sketch an account of this notion of epistemic gain.  I then draw some 
conclusions about Newton’s methodology.  While my account offers some 
vindication for Newton’s grand epistemic claims (not so far as 
‘certainty’, however), it contradicts his own methodological statements. 
  In short, the case highlights a key difference between Newton’s method 
of ‘deduction from phenomena’ and the popular hypothetico-deductive 
method.


-- 
J. Brian Pitts
Senior Research Associate
Faculty of Philosophy
University of Cambridge
[email protected]

Ph.D., Philosophy/History & Philosophy of Science, University of Notre 
Dame
Ph.D., Physics, University of Texas at Austin


_____________________________________________________
To unsubscribe from the CamPhilEvents mailing list,
or change your membership options, please visit
the list information page: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEvents

List archive: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEventsArchive

Please note that CamPhilEvents doesn't accept email
attachments. See the list information page for further 
details and suggested alternatives.

Reply via email to