Dear all,

Please join us for the CamPoS (Cambridge Philosophy of Science) seminar

Wednesday 25th February 1-2:30pm in the Deptartment of History and
Philosophy of Science, Seminar Room 2 (Basement).

Anna Alexandrova (Cambridge) will give a talk entitled "When
Measurement is Theory-Avoidant" (Joint work with Daniel Haybron). The
abstract is below.

Best wishes,

Christopher


Abstract:
Abstract: If all theories of measurement agree on a single requirement
it is that a measure of a phenomenon should be informed by our best
theory of this phenomenon. But what is the relevant theory when the
phenomenon is well-being, or indeed any other picked out by a thick
concept? On the current practice, measures of well-being are validated
by checking the psychometric properties of the questionnaires, whether
the results correlate well with other factors known to be relevant to
well-being and whether they accord reasonably with subjects’ own
understanding of what well-being is. Importantly, these measures are
not checked against any robust normative theory of well-being. To
anyone who takes well-being to be a value this status quo looks wrong.
Indeed it looks like avoidance of relevant theory. Yet bringing in
constraints on measures of well-being from philosophy raises worries:
who are philosophers to tell people what their well-being is, and to
tell scientists how to measure it? In this talk we first present a
coherentist interpretation of the current validation procedures and,
second, raise the theory-avoidance objection. Finally wereflect on how
to strike the right balance between, on the one hand, acting like a
philosopher-kings and, on the other, treating the scientific process
uncritically.

_____________________________________________________
To unsubscribe from the CamPhilEvents mailing list,
or change your membership options, please visit
the list information page: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEvents

List archive: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEventsArchive

Please note that CamPhilEvents doesn't accept email
attachments. See the list information page for further 
details and suggested alternatives.

Reply via email to