Thanks Esteban, I've just found this thread of Stephane http://forum.world.st/Cant-add-local-git-repo-to-Iceberg-tp5116836p5117058.html that explains a bit
Esteban Lorenzano wrote > Hi, > > From what I see, indeed you are missing some concepts of what iceberg is > and their relation with a package. > 1) iceberg is a VCS for Pharo, a frontend for git. > 2) an iceberg project stores packages and its versions (commits), but for > that you have to add or create an iceberg project and add the packages you > want to handle there. There is no automagical process. > 3) the "pharo" project there has what comes with pharo, not your packages. > If you want to store your packages, you need your own project. > > And well, that. > There are some videos around (no time to look for them now, but I am sure > someone can point to them) explaining how to use it and make things with > it. > But something to keep in mind, if you want to be happy with iceberg is: > Iceberg is NOT ENVY, and it will never be. Its design and patterns are > very different and require a different mindset to use it. > > Esteban > On Feb 5 2021, at 5:29 pm, Davide Varvello via Pharo-users < > pharo-users@.pharo > > wrote: >> Anyway Esteban, it's for sure a limit of mine, but It's an hour I'm >> trying to >> set up a local Iceberg for my package and I can't configure it. >> >> Some issue I faced: >> 1) I opened Iceberg and saw "pharo" had "Local repository missing", I >> guess >> there is a sort of default configuration so I tried to repair it. I ends >> with: "Project location does not seems to be a valid git repository." >> 2) Then I double clicked on "pharo" and searched for my package, there >> wasn't, so I added my package. Now the package is added but the local >> repository is always missing and I don't know how to create a new one. >> >> I wonder why there isn't a local repository by default when you create a >> package >> Thanks >> Davide >> >> >> >> Esteban Lorenzano wrote >> > indeed, it will fetch the history of each method that belongs to an >> > iceberg repository. >> > >> > Esteban >> > On Feb 5 2021, at 11:50 am, Davide Varvello via Pharo-users < >> >> > pharo-users@.pharo >> > > wrote: >> >> Hi Esteban, >> >> The "history" button in the minitoolbar of calypso is related to git, >> >> right? >> >> Because it's not shown in every method >> >> Cheers >> >> Davide >> >> >> >> >> >> Esteban Lorenzano wrote >> >> > Hi all, >> >> > >> >> > While the timestamp for the in-image change is, indeed, missing and >> >> needs >> >> > to be fixed, I want to point that we are abandoning the in-image >> author >> >> > tracking by method and replacing it with the git history (which wive >> >> you >> >> > also authorship and timestamp by commit). >> >> > This method commit history is already there (since Pharo 8) and can >> be >> >> > queried with the "history" button in the minitoolbar of calypso, >> same >> >> > place where you have the access to the version browser. >> >> > Yes, it is not the same, but it fulfills correctly (and improves it, >> >> since >> >> > it gives you the whole method history, not just what you have in >> image) >> >> > the old version functionality, which however will remain as a track >> of >> >> > in-image changes, but without the author (since is not needed). >> >> > >> >> > Even more, all the Author infrastructure is target for removal in >> next >> >> > versions of Pharo (just not right now :P) >> >> > cheers! >> >> > Esteban >> >> > >> >> > On Feb 5 2021, at 9:16 am, Richard Sargent < >> >> >> >> > richard.sargent@ >> >> > > wrote: >> >> >> Oh, yes/ That is one of the things I most love about ENVY and miss >> in >> >> >> everything else. >> >> >> What is the change history of this method, class, package, etc.? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 10:09 PM Kasper Osterbye < >> >> >> >> > kasper.osterbye@ >> >> > (mailto: >> >> > kasper.osterbye@ >> >> > )> wrote: >> >> >> > I went in and updated the corresponding github issue >> >> >> (https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/issues/7283). The tool is >> >> really >> >> >> useful, and it would be nice to have the author and timestamp in >> place >> >> >> again. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Sent from: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Users-f1310670.html >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Sent from: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Users-f1310670.html >> -- Sent from: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Users-f1310670.html
