indeed, it will fetch the history of each method that belongs to an iceberg 
repository.

Esteban
On Feb 5 2021, at 11:50 am, Davide Varvello via Pharo-users 
<pharo-users@lists.pharo.org> wrote:
> Hi Esteban,
> The "history" button in the minitoolbar of calypso is related to git, right?
> Because it's not shown in every method
> Cheers
> Davide
>
>
> Esteban Lorenzano wrote
> > Hi all,
> >
> > While the timestamp for the in-image change is, indeed, missing and needs
> > to be fixed, I want to point that we are abandoning the in-image author
> > tracking by method and replacing it with the git history (which wive you
> > also authorship and timestamp by commit).
> > This method commit history is already there (since Pharo 8) and can be
> > queried with the "history" button in the minitoolbar of calypso, same
> > place where you have the access to the version browser.
> > Yes, it is not the same, but it fulfills correctly (and improves it, since
> > it gives you the whole method history, not just what you have in image)
> > the old version functionality, which however will remain as a track of
> > in-image changes, but without the author (since is not needed).
> >
> > Even more, all the Author infrastructure is target for removal in next
> > versions of Pharo (just not right now :P)
> > cheers!
> > Esteban
> >
> > On Feb 5 2021, at 9:16 am, Richard Sargent &lt;
>
> > richard.sargent@
> > &gt; wrote:
> >> Oh, yes/ That is one of the things I most love about ENVY and miss in
> >> everything else.
> >> What is the change history of this method, class, package, etc.?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 10:09 PM Kasper Osterbye &lt;
>
> > kasper.osterbye@
> > (mailto:
> > kasper.osterbye@
> > )&gt; wrote:
> >> > I went in and updated the corresponding github issue
> >> (https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/issues/7283). The tool is really
> >> useful, and it would be nice to have the author and timestamp in place
> >> again.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Users-f1310670.html
>

Reply via email to