> Am 05.02.2020 um 19:02 schrieb horrido <horrido.hobb...@gmail.com>: > > >> >> You want to take the Smalltalk heritage as a definition, that’s ok. We > don’t, and that’s ok too. Is about what we want to do. > > Who's "we"? > As you have obviously trouble reading our web site for instructions like bug reporting or other things I copy the footer for you. „ Pharo is developed by an international community of open-source developers, coordinated and maintained by the pharo consortium and receives essential support from Inria, RMOD, CNRS, UDL, Cristal and many others.“
So we are a lot of core developers, Inria staff, consortium members and pharo board although I‘m not speaking on their behalf. > Last time I checked, nobody owns Pharo. Pharo is not a bunch of core > developers; it's a community. And I believe there are many Pharoers who > share my view. Where did you check? > > Since I'm a Smalltalk evangelist and not a Pharo evangelist, I guess I > shouldn't ever mention Pharo in my blog. After all, if it's not Smalltalk, > why should I promote it??? It is your initiative, you should know, nobody asked you to do it > > In fact, this is disastrous for my JRMPC competition since it's based > entirely on Pharo. I'm promoting Smalltalk but pushing Pharo on all the > participating teams??? What the f*ck am I doing?!! > I just know that you are reluctant for a very long time to hear what we are saying. The rest is yours Norbert > > > -- > Sent from: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Users-f1310670.html >
