On Sat, Sep 29, 2018 at 1:05 AM Guillermo Polito <guillermopol...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm sorry if I offended somebody. I've deleted the repository (it was > under pharo-repository, not under my name). With it the changes I made to > make it work on Pharo7. > > I understand that Peter's tool is easy, i've used it before. > But I have my constraints, as others has theirs. > Just note that lot of people complained but nobody took the work to > migrate it with Peter's tool. > Why? If that's so easy :) > > So I decided I was going to spend only ~1hour. It was > - Find the right code on sthub (Rmod repository or another one?) > - loading the code + doing a commit (couple of minutes) > - adapting the code for pharo 7 > - writing a baseline and testing it worked (in a new image, loading > dependencies) > - writing a readme, putting a link to the website > Also take into account that while tests run green on Pharo7, Milton's example was not working. And that I had to test manually. So count into my "hour" also: - loading Milton's code - (realize that I have to manually !!!!) load Roassal (otherwise his code does not load) - And test his code Of course I'm not paid for this, I did it for Milton, because apparently nobody was taking "ONE HOUR" to answer his email. And also there are a couple of Artefact examples (Jpeg related) that do not work since years and they add a bit of noise while you test because you don't know if there are more things broken or not. > > All of them are little tasks of a couple of minutes. Count interruptions > in the middle. > And now I'm sending this email out of frustration. > > On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 9:19 PM Norbert Hartl <norb...@hartl.name> wrote: > >> >> >> Am 28.09.2018 um 10:14 schrieb Guillermo Polito < >> guillermopol...@gmail.com>: >> >> >> >> On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 9:07 AM Torsten Bergmann <asta...@gmx.de> wrote: >> >>> Hi Guille, >>> >>> Yes, thanks. But it looks like the history is gone now - as you seem to >>> load and then commited >>> with Iceberg only. >>> >> >> Yes, that's what I did. >> >> >>> >>> By using Peters "STHub -> Git migration tool" the history of the changes >>> is preserved and moved into >>> the git history too. See https://github.com/peteruhnak/git-migration >> >> Would it be possible to use that? >>> >> >> Yes, that could be used. The thing is that I'm not Artefact's maintainer, >> and I did not want to invest more than one hour on this. >> But if someone wants to take the bull from the horns, that's ok ^^. >> >> It is not that much work. Just copying the code under your username I >> consider rude. I spent a lot of time migrating repos to github of packages >> I‘m not the maintainer of. The git-migration of Peter is so easy to use >> there is no reason not to use. >> >> History is important >> >> Norbert >> >> Guille >> >> > > -- > > > > Guille Polito > > Research Engineer > > Centre de Recherche en Informatique, Signal et Automatique de Lille > > CRIStAL - UMR 9189 > > French National Center for Scientific Research - *http://www.cnrs.fr > <http://www.cnrs.fr>* > > > *Web:* *http://guillep.github.io* <http://guillep.github.io> > > *Phone: *+33 06 52 70 66 13 > -- Guille Polito Research Engineer Centre de Recherche en Informatique, Signal et Automatique de Lille CRIStAL - UMR 9189 French National Center for Scientific Research - *http://www.cnrs.fr <http://www.cnrs.fr>* *Web:* *http://guillep.github.io* <http://guillep.github.io> *Phone: *+33 06 52 70 66 13
