Can you elaborate on what you consider as a kernel? There are always things 
moving in the pharo world. The last years the virtual machine got some 
iterations and it is still not fully stable. For pharo it is hard to have it 
stable because we feel the need that a lot of the existing parts need to be 
replaced to be useful in these times. Furthermore pharo is also prototyping 
platform for programming language features. All of these are counter-stability 
measures. So if you need a stable kernel from native ground up to UI pharo 
won‘t be that thing you are looking for the coming years (if at all). You 
always need to adopt to change so you need to define your required scope better 
in order to get an estimate.

Norbert

> Am 06.05.2018 um 11:31 schrieb Trygve Reenskaug <tryg...@ifi.uio.no>:
> 
> I'm working on a programing paradigm and IDE for the personal programmer who 
> wants to control his or her IoT. The size of the target audience I have in 
> mind is >100 million. I gave up Squeak long ago as a platform because they 
> obsolete my code faster than I can write it.  I have now frozen Squeak 3.10.2 
> and hope its runtime will survive until I find a better foundation. My hope 
> is that Pharo has a stable kernel that I can build on.  According to Stephan, 
> this is not so. Is there any plan for creating a stable Pharo kernel that 
> people can use for building software of lasting value for millions of 
> non-expert users? 
> --Thanks, Trygve
> 
>> On 05.05.2018 13:53, Stephan Eggermont wrote:
>> I’ve taken a look at what would be needed to
>> support magma on pharo a few years ago. Chris always told us he uses it
>> professionally on squeak and has not enough capacity to keep up with
>> changes in pharo without having a customer/maintainer for it. Twice a year
>> or so someone asks about magma on pharo and takes a look. AFAIK there are
>> no real obstacles to a port, but magma uses a lot of deep implementation
>> specifics that will take an experienced smalltalker to deal with, and a lot
>> of mailing list archeology as pharo changed a lot since magma worked on
>> pharo last
>> 
>> Stephan
> 
> -- 
> The essence of object orientation is that objects collaborate  to achieve a 
> goal. 
> Trygve Reenskaug      mailto: tryg...@ifi.uio.no
> Morgedalsvn. 5A       http://folk.uio.no/trygver/
> N-0378 Oslo             http://fullOO.info
> Norway                     Tel: (+47) 22 49 57 27

Reply via email to