On 13/04/2018 10:41, p...@highoctane.be wrote: > A somewhat unique name makes it easier to google for it (like Roassal > Pharo, or DeepTraverser Pharo, or Zinc Pharo). > These will give us hits that are relevant. > > Try System Browser, Inspector... > > And Apple has worked with NSObject and stuff like that without too much > trouble (at a much larger scale for whatever XyzKit they released). > Ah, yes, they used the "Kit" suffix. Maybe can we have something like > that with Pharo. Like SystemBrowserKit ( nah, too Appleish.
But I prefer these names: * Calypso System Browser * Calypso Debugger * Iceberg Source Control Management * Zinc HTTP Client * Zinc HTTP Server * Fuel Serialization * Glamorous Spotter [*] * etc. [*] I particularly dislike "Glamorous" adjective. In the case of wrapper for libraries I'm hesitant to decide whether to indicate pharo name in it or not. I mean stuff like a NaCl wrapper calling it "NaCl-Pharo" instead of calling "Salty". > Let's try SystemBrowserMeccano (longish), or SystemBrowserPack (too > bland), or SystemBrowserGear (why not), SystemBrowserRig (this one > sounds cool actually)). Fortunately in the past the lack of namespaces caused the use of prefixes instead of suffixes. With time prefixes become invisible. A suffix, instead, will get into all your names, bothering with other existing suffixes like `Component`, `Model`, `Collection`, and so on. -- Esteban A. Maringolo
