Super Yann! Keep pushing.
Let us know. This is important to announce like that other people can
join forces.


On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 11:52 PM, Yann Lesage <yannle...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Le 08/12/2017 à 17:13, Norbert Hartl a écrit :
>
>> Hi,
>>
>>> Am 08.12.2017 um 15:32 schrieb Yann Lesage <yannle...@gmail.com>:
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>>
>>> I write an driver for Arangodb . So like it's indicated in Arango
>>> documentation, I use the HTTP API.  The repo is
>>> https://github.com/Valtena/Pharango
>>>
>> that is really wonderful. I‘m planning to do that for a long time but
>> didn‘t find the time yet. Maybe I can find some time to help a little if you
>> are interested.
>
> I have see that on the Pharo Discord. I don't had finish a first version,
> write the road map and contributor.md, so it maybe a little early for that.
> But I not against a code review in futur or another help.
>
>>> Now, the problem : Arango using Znclient make around 1 000
>>> requests/second.
>>>
>>>
>>> And the question : Are there any recommended pratice to have the better
>>> performance with ZNClient or a better way to perform lot of HTTP requests ?
>>>
>> I think the biggest benefit comes from caching the ZnClient. It is
>> designed to be used like that. Next could be using keep-alive in order to
>> reduce the number of connections to be made. Finalky I could imagine that
>> pooling the most heavy objects in zinc can remove stress from the garbage
>> collector.
>
> I am agree with this. I cache the ZnClient, without that, I don't have more
> than 400 or 500 request/s. And the keep-alive is the default behavior in
> Arango et ZnClient.
>
>> Norbert
>>>
>>> Thanks for your attention,
>>>
>>> Yann Lesage
>
>
> Le 08/12/2017 à 22:14, Stephane Ducasse a écrit :
>>
>> Yann
>> I do not think that connecting a database via a HTTP client can be as
>> fast as with a FFI or other means.
>> This is mainly why database like Gemstone are superior for accessing a
>> lot of data.
>> Stef
>
>
> I know that, but I would try to have the better performances. After, user
> can group requests to limit the cost of http protocol. So, it's not a
> fatality. I think try to use the arango shell in futur. In first, I will
> finish the driver with HTTP client because is more easier to write it and
> more flexible in using with distant server.
>
> Yann Lesage
>

Reply via email to