> > I may have chosen the wrong words, sorry for that. The OPs comments sounded > so much like "why don't you have it like VW does" that I couldn't resist ;-)
Don't worry :) >> We have a dependency analyser that is really advanced since it can >> check that you have message that are not in extension >> of packages that you use. >> In January I hope that we will start packaging Applications (versus >> packaging code), so that people can deploy >> desktop applications more easily. > > Sounds like this is another area in which you guys are moving much faster > than it looks from the outside. Yes because what people see is just open a window. But inside we are trying our best to REALLY improve and it will pays off because having a powerful infrastructure will let us reinvent ourselves. > > I don't have enough time to look into Pharo as much as I would and just by > reading the mailing lists and just dipping my toes into Pharo from time to > time, I sometimes get the impression Pharo is moving so fast I just can't > follow. I still am not sure I understand that Git/Iceberg stuff, and that is > already old hats for you guys... Git is a modern distributed version system (it looks simple at first and may be super complex) :) Iceberg is a toolsuite and model to support git access from Pharo. We try to avoid to force people to do everything from the command line and provide abstraction also to manage Pull Requests which are not related to git but to github. >> Now if people like vikenti wants our support. They should learn how to >> engage a discussion with us and not >> just complain :) > > That's probably what I wanted to say, but I am a kind person ;-)) Me also but not all the time :) :)
