Which reminds me a guy that I tried to convince that become: is not the same as changeClassToThatOf: but he was super smart and knew so this is written in his super smart paper and I smile still now thinking about it.
On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 11:39 AM, Denis Kudriashov <dionisi...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Dimitris. > > You opinion about live programming reminds me the common sentence from > developers who don't care about languages at all. Usual argument is: they > all are Turing complete, so who cares. > > 2017-10-10 11:02 GMT+02:00 webwarrior <r...@webwarrior.ws>: >> >> Calm your tits, dude. No need to use Caps Lock that much :-) >> >> I made no value judgements in my post, letting readers decide for >> themselves. >> Nor did I attribute any claims to you. Except "live coding in Python is >> easy", which you did say in some earlier posts. >> >> > My post were not made to pick a fight but rather to inform and demolish >> > the wrong assumptions that other languages CANNOT DO live coding. >> >> Well, many of them kinda can. >> But you see, when live coding is an afterthought, problems appear here and >> there, and some of them are unsolvable. Up to the point that it's easier >> to >> do traditional development process and not bother with live coding at all. >> >> It's almost like saying that you can do point-free style functional >> programming in Python. >> Of course you can (to some extent). There is even a library for that >> (https://pypi.python.org/pypi/pointfree/). >> I there much sense in it? I don't think so. >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Sent from: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Users-f1310670.html >> >
