Again very generic statements , and I see you refer to tools and libraries instead of OOP. We talking here Pharo vs Python on the language level because Python obviously does not come with an IDE. But then Pharo does not come with literate programming tools or libraries as well.
I rather not go down the rabbit hole of third party libraries because obviously I cannot participate in a discussion about libraries and areas of coding, I know nothing about. Plus Python has countless of libraries which makes a very longer discussion even if I was familiar with them and Pharo has much less but still quite a lot of libraries as well. On Sat, 7 Oct 2017 at 04:46, Offray Vladimir Luna Cárdenas < offray.l...@mutabit.com> wrote: > Hi, > > > On 06/10/17 20:41, Dimitris Chloupis wrote: > > I am no expert in OOP but I cannot say I have found a thing that Pharo > > can do that Python can’t or is more difficult. Python obviously is > > very heavily inspired by Smalltalk . > > I can find one: creating an environment for reproducible research and > literate computing (interactive documentation). It can be done on both, > but is harder and a lot more complicated in Python that in Pharo, as > experience have shown [1] > > [1] > > http://mutabit.com/offray/static/blog/output/posts/grafoscopio-idea-and-initial-progress.html > > Cheers, > > Offray > >
