Esteban, I think that when Stef says "a mini version of pillar" he does not mean a mini version of the parser or the AST, but a version that does not have the exporting to html/latex/...
On Sat, Aug 12, 2017 at 4:37 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <esteba...@gmail.com> wrote: > and btw, this kind of threads belongs to pharo-dev, not to pharo-users :) > > Esteban > > > On 12 Aug 2017, at 16:35, Esteban Lorenzano <esteba...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > >> On 12 Aug 2017, at 12:46, Tudor Girba <tu...@tudorgirba.com> wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> I would very much like this path. What would constitute tiny? > > > > no idea, we need to think on it :) > > but I see no point in create a new (even small) parser/scanner each time > we need one. At the end you have several small parsers that repeat always > same process when PetitParser is good for most of our problems (and if you > need to improve it. you can always load PP compiler, etc.). > > > > Esteban > > > >> > >> Cheers, > >> Doru > >> > >> > >>> On Aug 11, 2017, at 9:10 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <esteba...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >>> > >>> hi, > >>> > >>>> On 11 Aug 2017, at 18:57, Cyril Ferlicot D. <cyril.ferli...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Another step would be to get a minimal parser not relying on > >>>> PetitParser. > >>> > >>> Let’s think differently: why not to include a tiny PetitParser? > >>> Then we can think on: > >>> > >>> - pillar sintax (better than just a restricted version) > >>> - simplify other “small parsers” that are already on the image. > >>> - we provide a tool to o cool stuff (instead relying as always in > regexp, etc.) > >>> > >>> cheers, > >>> Esteban > >> > >> -- > >> www.tudorgirba.com > >> www.feenk.com > >> > >> "Beauty is where we see it." > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > > > -- Guille Polito Research Engineer French National Center for Scientific Research - *http://www.cnrs.fr* <http://www.cnrs.fr> *Web:* *http://guillep.github.io* <http://guillep.github.io> *Phone: *+33 06 52 70 66 13
