On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 4:10 PM, Dimitris Chloupis <kilon.al...@gmail.com> wrote:
> from my extremely limited understanding about web dev, Seaside if my > memory serves me correctly it integrate JS/ HTML/ CSS . IT has many great > features, its mature and well documented. Most likely most existing pharo > web dev frameworks do this as well. > Yes, it is good. But all the state is on the server, so it is not much help for an in-browser web app. A thin client model rather than a fat client that has a very responsive UI and also works well with interrupted connectivity as is often the case with mobile. So not really my use case. > > PharoJS is definitely a very cool idea, but its a big project none the > less , so it will take some time for it to get there. Assuming devs > contribute to it, the massive difference between "I want" and "I make". > Exactly. It would be cool if we could unite a few competent people with self-interest to help the project forward. I have this self-interest, but not the skills (or time to acquire them) to do it alone. Have tried ;) -- Siemen > > > On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 12:47 PM Siemen Baader <siemenbaa...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> Is anyone else interested in PharoJS and making it mature for their own >> commercial mobile and single page web app (and node.js) development? >> >> I think it has a huge potential because it brings the browser runtime and >> many libraries and online services from the JS world to us Smalltalkers >> while letting us keep our agile development and good CS practices. But it >> does not yet have the necessary features and documentation to work smoothly. >> >> -- Siemen >> >
