:) This is supercool to see BioSmalltalk being mentioned and analysed. May be hernan should contact the authors.
Hi Hernan, apparently BioSmalltalk is the faster in the field of Bio* platforms (BioPerl, BioPython, BioJava, ...) and the more trendy: http://www.ijcseonline.org/spl_pub_paper/PID%2023.pdf I would love to believe in that ;-) But if you read carefully the paper, you will found that authors has made a dramatic mistake ... They think that Pharo was the name of BioSmalltalk ... and then they compare with Google Trends, Pharo against BioPerl, BioPython, ... Anyways the statement that BioSmalltalk is the faster is maybe true :-) Hernan did you know this paper ? Regards,
-- Using Opera's mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
