Mcz repos are useful. STH storage works nicely, that's more the frontend which si bitrotting.
I actually have a local FTP based thing on my Synology and it is neat and needs no time to work. Did you ever look into Zinc and see there is also a server there for that? Now, GitHub is better for sharing as there is the *critical mass* there. And the tooling is very good. And we can stuff a lot of other things than mcz in it (and with Git LFS https://git-lfs.github.com/ we could even stuff images and mcz in there right away. This thing is next in line for inclusion in https://github.com/Pharophile/ExternalTools In pvt chats on Slack, there is this tension between moving forward and stabilizing stuff. I hope that with boostrap, we'll be able to have a stable core and LTS assemblies. Reinventing the wheel is fun. But it better has to be a better wheel. Let's alway thing about our "normal" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FvmTSpJU-Xc We are at risk of boiling ourselves, in whatever plane we are. I like the progress and I hate to have to adapt. But once past the curve, life is actually better. Lots. Phil On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 5:29 AM, Igor Stasenko <siguc...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 6 November 2016 at 17:21, Stephan Eggermont <step...@stack.nl> wrote: > >> Kilon wrote: >> > If you really want to embrace Github , kill Smalltalkhub >> >> We are not close to doing that. We'll need >> Monticello support indefinitely, and at least a few years two-way. And >> that assumes we automatically migrate all open projects. >> >> First we need good workflows that also work for complex projects. That >> includes cross-platform projects like Seaside >> >> > Oh, come on! Throw away everything you had.. and start using something new > and trendy, rinse and repeat. Profit! > :) > > >> Stephan >> >> >> >> > > > -- > Best regards, > Igor Stasenko. >
