On 11/6/16 9:05 AM, stepharo wrote:
Hi

I would like that you think a bit about our community and that there is a value in using common tools

to share and develop common libraries. Because to me it feels like we are getting balkanize.


It may look super cool and be hyper trendy to use github (because like that you can say that you use latest hyper cool

features), but I would like to ask especially people building libraries to pay attention that it is important

that other people can contribute back easily and that there is an easy way to load/contribute.

Today I experienced Bloc

    - I cannot load code and I cannot contribute.

- I saw mdl with a mixture between smalltalkhub and github (sounds super hyper cool) and I saw paul not being able to contribute :(
Stef, I have been working with git/monticello projects for about 5 years now and have been using a "mixed system" during that entire time ... My message has been consistent that in order to make a smooth transition that you need some specific tools, now the fact that you guys are _not_ building those tools has been concerning me for some time now ... I sent mails at the beginning of this year a) describing the tools to the best of my ability and b) offering to help ... it seems that you are somehow blaming git/github for this problem ... and as I come to this discussion late others are blaming smalltalkhub ...

I don't think it is necessary to move everything to github, as I said, I have been using a "mixed system" for 5 years ... and I think that the problem lies in the lack of the proper tools ... of course your problems with Bloc may be actually totally unrelated to packages, but it is clear to me that you are frustrated with the environment ... and that is a tools problem!

I can and want to help.

I have had good discussions with the Pharo team, but I am afraid that I am not able to get my ... to me ... simple points across ... and it is frustrating to me that I am not able to successfully communicate the simple solutions that I see ...

I will repeat that Pharo is missing some very critical tools that I consider to be absolutely required (in some form) to be able to be successful ... the required tools do not take a phd to implement, they are very straightforward and simple ... perhaps they are not sexy and complicated so noone is interested, but they are required ...

If you want to have a conversation about this I am willing ... now it happens that I am in Buenos Aires (soon to be Tucuman) so this week is not convenient for me to talk ...

If you don't want to talk to me then look at the series of messages that I wrote last winter/spring to this mailing list (or pharo dev) where I described what I think you guys are missing ... and then ask me questions ...

Dale

Reply via email to