It's in http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~cdlm/Experiments
Not sure if it's Transducers or Reducers. Most probably the latter is the
ported code from VW, I recall having success running some examples, but the
tests probably will not (I recall trying to rewrite them using BabyMock2
but it's either failed or unfinished).
On 29 September 2016 at 16:50, stepharo <steph...@free.fr> wrote:
> I would love to see this package and a little documentation on it.
>
> Stef
>
> Le 29/9/16 à 15:02, Damien Pollet a écrit :
>
> Same with transducers/reducers, except they work by pushing values through
> the pipeline instead of pulling them. The library I started porting from VW
> last year had a dual API, one more like the original Clojure transducers,
> and one more like Xtreams.
>
> One nice point of going collection→stream & filters→result is that the
> final step is explicit, so you can pick what kind of result you build
> (could be a collection or a single aggregated value).
>
> On 29 September 2016 at 12:40, Denis Kudriashov <dionisi...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> 2016-09-29 12:39 GMT+02:00 Denis Kudriashov <dionisi...@gmail.com>:
>>
>>> and collect: could be rewritten to use a generator.
>>>>
>>>> Now does anybody play with this already?
>>>>
>>>> Does xtream provide a way to do something in the same vein?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Yes. XStream supports it:
>>>
>>> (1 to: 1000) reading transforming: [:in :out | | each | each := in get.
>>> out put: each -1; put: each; put: each + 1]
>>>
>>
>> But you probably wants different:
>>
>> (1 to: 1000) reading collecting: [:each | {each -1. each. each + 1} ]
>>
>
>
>
