I would love to see this package and a little documentation on it.


Stef

Le 29/9/16 à 15:02, Damien Pollet a écrit :
Same with transducers/reducers, except they work by pushing values through the pipeline instead of pulling them. The library I started porting from VW last year had a dual API, one more like the original Clojure transducers, and one more like Xtreams.

One nice point of going collection→stream & filters→result is that the final step is explicit, so you can pick what kind of result you build (could be a collection or a single aggregated value).

On 29 September 2016 at 12:40, Denis Kudriashov <dionisi...@gmail.com <mailto:dionisi...@gmail.com>> wrote:


    2016-09-29 12:39 GMT+02:00 Denis Kudriashov <dionisi...@gmail.com
    <mailto:dionisi...@gmail.com>>:

            and collect: could be rewritten to use a generator.

            Now does anybody play with this already?

            Does xtream provide a way to do something in the same vein?


        Yes. XStream supports it:

        (1 to: 1000) reading transforming: [:in :out | | each | each
        := in get. out  put: each -1; put: each; put: each + 1]


    But you probably wants different:

    (1 to: 1000) reading collecting: [:each | {each -1. each. each + 1} ]



Reply via email to