Thanks, am I wrong in assuming the UPnP and IGD are rather huge and complicated things to implement? I just want to figure out if there is a clear answer to the question if implementing a subset or using a library (mini upnp) through FFI is more feasible.
Norbert > Am 25.07.2016 um 16:10 schrieb Henrik Johansen <henrik.s.johan...@veloxit.no>: > > >> On 25 Jul 2016, at 12:13 , Norbert Hartl <norb...@hartl.name> wrote: >> >> Does anyone know some code or person that did something with UPnP/IGD in >> pharo? >> >> thanks, >> >> Norbert > > > I've done an SSDP client/server, but not gone so far as to build a full UPnP > model on top of it, since I just needed a discovery protocol. > http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~henriksp/SSDP. > > Should be possible to use as a base though; you can make a client with type > ssdp:all, and get some fun replies indicating the services available on UPnP > routers. > > Caveats apply to the socket init code which is really ugly, it attempts to > listen on all the interfaces present at the time of client creation, but the > correct primitives aren't really exposed from the plugin, the results can be > a bit hit and miss depending on OS/Distribution; nor are there hooks to get > notified when interfaces go up/down, so accounting for such currently comes > down to manual resets. > > Cheers, > Henry
