btw, why NeoJSON is not deprecated in benefit of STON?

Esteban

> On 01 Jul 2016, at 08:52, stepharo <steph...@free.fr> wrote:
> 
> Thanks sven
> 
> I was thinking to add a section in the chapter but I will wait for your 
> solution.
> 
> 
> stef
> 
> 
> Le 1/7/16 à 00:56, Sven Van Caekenberghe a écrit :
>> Hi,
>> 
>> Yes, object properties in JSON are not ordered, by definition. But for 
>> humans it can make sense.
>>  Converting your domain objects to OrderedDictionaries or overwriting 
>> #neoJSONOn: are valid ways to control NeoJSON.
>> 
>> However, I also think that it might be possible to solve the ordering 
>> requirement with a regular mapping, provided I make a little internal change 
>> - I will investigate that and report back.
>> 
>> Sven
>> 
>>> On 30 Jun 2016, at 17:29, PBKResearch <pe...@pbkresearch.co.uk> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Bernardo
>>>  Thanks for this. After sending my previous mail, I did what I should have 
>>> done first and looked at list of collection objects in the system browser. 
>>> So I discovered OrderedDictionary for the first time. I am pleased to see 
>>> that this is the key to the solution.
>>>  Peter
>>>  From: Pharo-users [mailto:pharo-users-boun...@lists.pharo.org] On Behalf 
>>> Of Bernardo Ezequiel Contreras
>>> Sent: 30 June 2016 16:17
>>> To: Any question about pharo is welcome <pharo-users@lists.pharo.org>
>>> Subject: Re: [Pharo-users] Provide a mapping for a collection of 
>>> <Association>s in NeoJSON
>>>  Peter,
>>>   i had the same issue, i couldn't find the way to do it, but i hack my own 
>>> writing like this
>>>  NDBFood>>neoJsonOn: neoJSONWriter
>>>             "custom writing"
>>>               neoJSONWriter
>>>                         writeMap:
>>>                                     (OrderedDictionary new
>>>                                                 add: 'ndb_no' -> ndbno;
>>>                                                 add: 'full_name' -> name;
>>>                                                 add: 'food_group' -> fg;
>>>                                                 add: 'factors' -> self 
>>> factors;
>>>                                                 add: 'nutrients' -> self 
>>> nutrients;
>>>                                                 yourself)
>>>  i just implement my own writing for my objects.
>>>  HTH
>>>  On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 12:06 PM, PBKResearch <pe...@pbkresearch.co.uk> 
>>> wrote:
>>>> Hello
>>>>  I have recently used NeoJSON for the first time. All went pretty well, 
>>>> but I would like to make a small tweak to the output, which probably 
>>>> involves defining a mapping. I have read through the information in the 
>>>> NeoJSON pdf, and also looked at the class comments, but I am  a bit lost. 
>>>> Could Sven or anyone please give me a hint?
>>>>  What I want is to construct a JSON object as a Pharo dictionary, but then 
>>>> control the order in which the fields are output to the JSON file. Clearly 
>>>> the order is irrelevant for a computer, but it could be helpful to a human 
>>>> reader to put them in an order which reflects the way humans think about 
>>>> the objects. The keys of a dictionary are of course unordered, so this is 
>>>> not possible, but if we step back a bit we see that a dictionary is often 
>>>> constructed from a collection of associations; if we could stop at this 
>>>> stage, and have a mapping which outputs the associations in the order in 
>>>> which they appear in the collection, this would give the control I am 
>>>> looking for.
>>>>  Am I talking nonsense, or is there any way of implementing this using 
>>>> NeoJSON mappings?
>>>>  Best wishes
>>>>  Peter Kenny
>>> 
>>>  -- 
>>> Bernardo E.C.
>>>  Sent from a cheap desktop computer in South America.
>> 
>> 
> 
> 


Reply via email to