Silly question: do you have a couple of Nautilus windows open? Loading stuff generates annoucements and Nautilus updates are killing performance.
Phil Le 30 juin 2015 00:36, "Jan Blizničenko" <blizn...@fit.cvut.cz> a écrit : > And one another benchmark of linux in VM on that desktop PC: > Roassal loading - 58 s > compilations per second - avg: 262.4682, min: 257.194, max: 289.684 > ...so the desktop PC is capable of better result and problem is somewhere > in > Windows, which I was afraid of... > > I'd also like to add to previous Windows tests that with antivirus turned > on > everything takes more time approximately by half of original time. > > Jan > > > Jan Blizničenko wrote > > Desktop: 386 s. > > Notebook: 48 s. > > Linux in VM on notebook: 27 s. > > > > > > Notebook: compilations per second - avg: 217.7153, min: 5.0, max: 247.258 > > Desktop: compilations per second - avg: 23.1337, min: 19.448, max: 28.155 > > Linux in VM on notebook: compilations per second - avg: > 529.0066600000001, > > min: 5.0, max: 573.97 > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://forum.world.st/Slow-compilation-on-one-of-my-Windows-PCs-tp4834668p4834713.html > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > >
