I ran it in Pharo 4 (40616) because method putSource:inFile:withPreamble: no longer exists in Pharo 5 and results are:
Desktop... all: 13.062 per second compile: 6,603 per second (why the hell is there comma as separator and not dot?) store: 13.431 per second add: 406.400 per second Notebook... all: 210.180 per second compile: 12,007 per second store: 454.818 per second add: 806.239 per second Jan Peter Uhnák wrote > Windows XP > 1011857707 bytecodes/sec; 132044070 sends/sec > > Debian > 1172295363 bytecodes/sec; 144744207 sends/sec > > But I think taking the compile: method apart tells a better story > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > code := 'a'. > > method := Object compiler > source: code; > requestor: nil; > failBlock: [ ^nil ]; > compile. > > all := [ > Object compile: code. > ]. > > compile := [ > Object compiler > source: code; > requestor: nil; > failBlock: [ ^nil ]; > compile. > ]. > > store := [ > method putSource: code inFile: 2 > withPreamble: [:f | f cr; nextPut: $!; nextChunkPut: 'Behavior method'; > cr]. > ]. > > add := [ > Object addSelector: method selector withMethod: method notifying: nil. > ]. > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > > Windows XP: > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > all bench. "'183.763 per second'" > compile bench. "'10,729 per second'" > *store bench. "'286.170 per second'"* > add bench. "'697.883 per second'" > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > Debian > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > all bench. "'622.551 per second'" > compile bench. "'11,129 per second'" > *store bench. "'41,604 per second'"* > add bench. "'787.885 per second'" > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > 150x slower disk operations? -_- > > I mean for normal programming this doesn't really matter, but when we are > downloading even medium-sized package it takes ages to process... > > Peter -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Slow-compilation-on-one-of-my-Windows-PCs-tp4834668p4834771.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
