2015-06-30 3:17 GMT+02:00 Clément Bera <bera.clem...@gmail.com>: > What about "1 tinyBenchmarks" ? > > Just to know if the VM is slower as a whole or only compilation / source > access ? >
most time is spend on primitives FilePrimitives are slow on windows. > > 2015-06-30 0:36 GMT+02:00 Jan Blizničenko <blizn...@fit.cvut.cz>: > >> And one another benchmark of linux in VM on that desktop PC: >> Roassal loading - 58 s >> compilations per second - avg: 262.4682, min: 257.194, max: 289.684 >> ...so the desktop PC is capable of better result and problem is somewhere >> in >> Windows, which I was afraid of... >> >> I'd also like to add to previous Windows tests that with antivirus turned >> on >> everything takes more time approximately by half of original time. >> >> Jan >> >> >> Jan Blizničenko wrote >> > Desktop: 386 s. >> > Notebook: 48 s. >> > Linux in VM on notebook: 27 s. >> > >> > >> > Notebook: compilations per second - avg: 217.7153, min: 5.0, max: >> 247.258 >> > Desktop: compilations per second - avg: 23.1337, min: 19.448, max: >> 28.155 >> > Linux in VM on notebook: compilations per second - avg: >> 529.0066600000001, >> > min: 5.0, max: 573.97 >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://forum.world.st/Slow-compilation-on-one-of-my-Windows-PCs-tp4834668p4834713.html >> Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> >
