> On 02 May 2015, at 23:28, p...@highoctane.be wrote:
>
> When some sysadmin has to edit them on servers, you want them in .st files.
>
> No class. No IDE. Not too much Smalltalk.
>
but then
- if not smalltalk, the scripts should not be in the image… even in workspaces
- if the sysadmin has to edit them, he can always do something like:
#! /bin/bash
pharo MyImage.image eval “
my
multilined
more or less smalltalk
script”
- you can always see and edit your scripts by doing:
'play-cache' asFileReference inspect
(instead ‘play-cache’ you can put: ‘my-script-folder’, whatever)
and you will have a complete inspector that allows you to see and edit your
scripts (who are in the file system, where a sysadmin can find them, and not in
an obscure workspace).
also I bet you would take no more than 5’ to add functionality to gtinspector
(it is designed to be moldable, after all) to add new scripts, and no matter
what other functionality you need… and the result will be a lot more “pharoish”
than storing it in a workspace.
Esteban
> Just the DSL on an as needed to know basis to configure things.
>
> That's better that XML/YAML/JSON...
>
> So, that's the case.
>
> Startup scripts same story.
>
> Phil
>
> Le 2 mai 2015 17:56, "Esteban Lorenzano" <esteba...@gmail.com
> <mailto:esteba...@gmail.com>> a écrit :
> well… IMO those scripts also should be in a method.
> Probably under a class named: MyCoolProjectRunScripts or something like that…
> but in a class.
> If they are in a class you can:
> - save them with your project
> - version them
> - if you add <script> pragma, you can even execute them by clicking on it
> (Pharo 4).
>
> so… even if you might have a case where you want the save/load… you actually
> have (what I consider) a better option.
>
> Esteban
>
>> On 02 May 2015, at 15:17, Esteban A. Maringolo <emaring...@gmail.com
>> <mailto:emaring...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Ditto here.
>>
>> I have cron tasks that fire a smalltak script, the startup script itself or
>> a small import script that doesn't belong to a class. All those are my cases
>> for the workspace.
>>
>> El may 2, 2015 4:38 AM, "p...@highoctane.be <mailto:p...@highoctane.be>"
>> <p...@highoctane.be <mailto:p...@highoctane.be>> escribió:
>> playground cache is actually not nice when scripts are to be part of a
>> project with a name etc. And I have a ton of files in it. I can't remember
>> which is which.
>>
>> I have scripts to do lots of cli things and I like the save as of the
>> workspace.
>>
>> But I have done extra key bindings for getting the ws or the playground.
>>
>> Phil
>> Le 2 mai 2015 06:49, "Sergio Fedi" <sergio.f...@gmail.com
>> <mailto:sergio.f...@gmail.com>> a écrit :
>> Oh! That link gives a GREAT explanation! Thanks.
>>
>> On the subject of how to show it better, I'm not a graphic designer
>> (although I'm working with one)
>> so I'll ask him for some insights on the matter.
>>
>>
>> For now, he pointed out some issues like lack of consistency on some
>> interfaces
>> and some other details.
>>
>
