How do you manage your bugs now?

Le 20/3/15 05:46, Hernán Morales Durand a écrit :
Ok, done

http://biosmalltalk.blogspot.com/2015/03/biosmalltalk-now-available-through.html

Cheers,

Hernán

2015-03-19 9:37 GMT-03:00 Esteban Lorenzano <esteba...@gmail.com <mailto:esteba...@gmail.com>>:


    On 19 Mar 2015, at 13:34, Hernán Morales Durand
    <hernan.mora...@gmail.com <mailto:hernan.mora...@gmail.com>> wrote:

    Hi Stef,

    2015-03-19 9:00 GMT-03:00 stepharo <steph...@free.fr
    <mailto:steph...@free.fr>>:

        Hernan

        The pharo board could send a mail to the open bio informatic
        foundation.


    That would be really nice!

        Are you member of their foundation?


    Yes, I have became member by Sep 27/2011.

        BTW I imagine that you will have to migrate
        https://code.google.com/p/biosmalltalk/
        to github?


    Will do it then tomorrow.

    (that’s because Google is closing his code site and they suggest
    to use github or bitbucket instead, not a requirement from our
    side :P)

    cheers,
    Esteban

    Thank you

    Hernán

        Stef

        Le 19/3/15 07:39, Hernán Morales Durand a écrit :
        Hi Offray,

        For a biologist without interest in bioinformatics at all,
        it would be hard to "sell" him any Bio* library. They could
        be better with workflow systems like Galaxy, MyExperiment,
        or the Integrated Genome Viewer, etc. biology is an
        extremely diversified field, but actually Smalltalk is the
        perfect environment for biologists!

        To me, a demonstration of the power of BioSmalltalk is the
        realease of PhyloclassTalk which I *know* couldn't be
        possible with Python, Java, Perl, for a single developer in
        a short period of time. No matter how many books and
        marketing they try to sell, the capability of exploring and
        debugging objects in a live environment is unbeatable.

        But BioSmalltalk needs desperately other developers. I am
        open to explain the internals and boring details to anyone.
        In the past I tried to talk with pythonists but that was
        like talking to a wall, the feeling I perceived was the
        environment was so different that they seemed to be scared.
        Scared of everything they learnt was not worth it. But the
        power is there for everyone, you can inspect a DNA sequence,
        query for its properties in a new Inspector, send it to a
        server and return its alignment, re-format and serialize,
        all like using an exploratory data analysis with
        observational transformations.

        I also tried to BioSmalltalk gets accepted to the Open
        Bionformatics Foundation (actually I only requested a page
        in their wiki for project visibility & promotion), but
        **precisely** at the time of my request, they occurred to
        implement a new whole policy of project acceptance (but of
        course BioRuby, BioJava, BioPerl and BioPython were all in
        so they were excluded) and I would have to pay international
        conference calls to talk with them(?) about.... I don't know.

        So, the status is the same, but with more objects :). I have
        added classes for parsing the Taxonomy Of Life, taxdb, EBI
        and file formats. I hope to have the chance to work with the
        cools project people is releasing in this community.
        Cheers,

        Hernán

        2015-03-18 23:06 GMT-03:00 Offray Vladimir Luna Cárdenas
        <off...@riseup.net <mailto:off...@riseup.net>>:




            -------- Mensaje reenviado --------
            Asunto: Re: [Pharo-users] [ANN] BioSmalltalk
            Fecha: Wed, 18 Mar 2015 20:53:05 -0500
            De: Offray Vladimir Luna Cárdenas <off...@riseup.net
            <mailto:off...@riseup.net>>
            Para: pharo-us...@lists.gforge.inria.fr
            <mailto:pharo-us...@lists.gforge.inria.fr>

            Hi,

            I just found this old mail. I know that BioSmalltalk is
            well and
            advancing and I have a friend who works on biocomputing.
            I Saw the
            Google Code page of the project, but as a not-programmer
            I found
            difficult to understand what is the "selling point" of
            Biosmalltalk for
            a biologist...

            Anyway I'm just curious about which new experience
            brings Smalltalk to
            old fields. In my own case, making my notebook for data
            narratives and
            visualization has been very enriching and even if there
            are external
            tools in other ecosystems to work on it (pandas,
            Jupyter, LaTeX), the
            integration with them inside a moldable and modifiable
            tool is hard to beat.

            Cheers,

            Offray

            El 15/03/12 a las 07:32, Hernán Morales Durand escribió:

                Dear all,

                It's been two years since I've started to work in
                bioinformatics with
                Smalltalk. It has been a difficult decision because
                the quality and
                amount of bioinformatics libraries is absolutely
                amazing, but I've
                received a lot of support from the main researchers
                at the Institute
                of Genetics where I'm working in Argentina.

                Now the initial step for a BioSmalltalk release is
                done. I hope the
                FOSS community receive this pre-release as the basis
                for future
                enhacements for bioinformatics with any Smalltalk
                flavor. Although in
                the short-term it is unlikely for a BioSmalltalk to
                reach the users,
                maturity and competitive level of major Bio*
                toolkits (BioPerl,
                BioPython, BioRuby or BioJava), it could take too
                many years more if I
                continue this work alone. However, BioSmalltalk was
                not conceived to
                replace or defeat any other similar packages, but to
                provide to the
                bioinformatics community the features of a pure
                object system. So feel
                free to spread the word for all bioinformaticians,
                newcomers,
                developers, or life scientists, for helping in any
                way and discovering
                why Smalltalk is such a special environment.

                This release was implemented in Pharo 1.3 custom
                Core, but cross
                Smalltalk portability was a priority. I'm working
                now to release
                versions for GemStone, Squeak and VisualWorks is
                there is enough
                interest. Everybody is welcome to contribute.

                You may download a pre-compiled release from the
                project page:
                http://code.google.com/p/biosmalltalk/

                Best regards,

                Hernán












Reply via email to