> On Feb 11, 2015, at 5:08 PM, Esteban A. Maringolo <emaring...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Syntax extensions (pluggable?):
> I know we have many alternatives, which I used and are more than
> acceptable , but I'd like to write JSON as close as possible to its
> original syntax.
+1 except I would not say that "I want to write JSON as close as possible”.
It’s either zero friction or it’s already good enough.
In Amber, for example, you already can write a JSON object “as close as
possible” to the original syntax and is o-kay but is not really great because
you’re still being taxed when compared to JavaScript and that taxing might
never payoff, that’s why I say that we are either currently okay or we move
towards zero-JSON-friction.
Amber:
#{ ‘key1’-> value1. ‘key2 -> value2 } <— kind of okay, survivable
JavaScript:
{key1: value1, key2: value2} <— awesome, no friction to party with the rest
of the world, it rocks!
