Hi Dale, The wildcards on tags, are they available on branch names as well?
I wonder about the choice for ? and *, because: - In RE(s), ? is 0 or 1 occurence, * is 0 or any number of occurences. - In shells (bash?), ? is any one character, * is 0 or any number of characters. i.e. ? matches less than * in both cases. In Metacello, it is the reverse: 1.0.? matches more labels than 1.0.* Thierry 2015-01-27 15:57 GMT+01:00 Dale Henrichs <dale.henri...@gemtalksystems.com>: > Kilon, > > One more point that you might find useful ... If you use tags (i.e., > v1.0.0, v1.0.1, v1.1.0), you can specify tag wildcards in the branch field > of the github repository description. > > Using Thierry's example the following resolves the latest commit on the > master branch (bleeding edge): > > github://ThierryGoubier/SmaCC:master > > Using a tag name, you can match the tagged commit: > > github://ThierryGoubier/SmaCC:v1.0.0 > github://ThierryGoubier/SmaCC:v1.1.0 > > Using a tag wildcard you can specify the latest tag 1.0.*: > > github://ThierryGoubier/SmaCC:v1.0.* > > which matches v1.0.1, v1.0.2, whichever is latest, but not v1.0.2.1. > > To match the latest tag in the 1.0 family use 1.0.?: > > github://ThierryGoubier/SmaCC:v1.0.? > > which matches v1.0.1, v1.0.2 and v1.0.2.1. > > There are more examples here[1]. > > This feature was introduced in Metacello 1.0.0-beta.32.16[2]. > > Dale > > [1] > https://github.com/dalehenrich/metacello-work/issues/277#issuecomment-58970696 > [2] > https://github.com/dalehenrich/metacello-work/issues?q=milestone%3A1.0.0-beta.32.16+is%3Aclosed > > > On 1/27/15 1:52 AM, kilon alios wrote: > > beautiful it worked like a charm following your instructions , I now can > brake my project to smaller ones, each one with each own github repo and > use Baselines to load each one and still allow the user to load my Project > in one single click from Configuration Browser. Love it how Pharo make this > all this so easy, with python it was a nightmare. Brilliant just Brilliant > ! :) > > On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 11:19 AM, Thierry Goubier < > thierry.goub...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi Kilon, >> >> a simple way to do that is to change your configuration so that it uses >> the baseline in your github. The SmaCC configuration for Pharo 4.0 is >> written in this way for the stable version. >> >> version204: spec >> <version: '2.0.4' imports: #('2.0-baseline')> >> spec >> for: #'pharo4.x' >> do: [ >> spec >> blessing: #stable; >> author: 'ThierryGoubier'; >> description: 'SmaCC Smalltalk Compiler Compiler for Pharo >> 4.0'. >> spec >> baseline: 'SmaCC' with: [ spec repository: >> 'github://ThierryGoubier/SmaCC:master' ]; >> import: 'SmaCC' ] >> >> Thierry >> >> >> >> 2015-01-27 10:08 GMT+01:00 kilon alios <kilon.al...@gmail.com>: >> >>> So I have a Configuration in the Meta repo of pharo 4 and 3 that loads >>> the latest version of my project Ephestos. >>> >>> However I have moved my development to github since I am very happy >>> with the workflow and since I discovered loading github repos via a >>> baseline I have little use for smalltalkhub. >>> >>> So my plan is this, keep the configuration in the meta repo so people >>> and me can install my project easily with one click via the wonderful >>> simple configuration browser , but I dont want anymore to load any versions >>> with it. Instead I want to tell the configuration "load the github >>> baseline" which means it will fetch the code from my github account master >>> branch which is the stable branch anyway (and the only branch so far) . >>> >>> That will allow me to never have to update that configuration again >>> since it will just load the latest code from github repo. >>> >>> The question is how to do this the easiest and cleanest way possible ? >>> >> >> > >
