beautiful it worked like a charm following your instructions , I now can
brake my project to smaller ones, each one with each own github repo and
use Baselines to load each one and still allow the user to load my Project
in one single click from Configuration Browser. Love it how Pharo make this
all this so easy, with python it was a nightmare. Brilliant just Brilliant
! :)
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 11:19 AM, Thierry Goubier <thierry.goub...@gmail.com
> wrote:
> Hi Kilon,
>
> a simple way to do that is to change your configuration so that it uses
> the baseline in your github. The SmaCC configuration for Pharo 4.0 is
> written in this way for the stable version.
>
> version204: spec
> <version: '2.0.4' imports: #('2.0-baseline')>
> spec
> for: #'pharo4.x'
> do: [
> spec
> blessing: #stable;
> author: 'ThierryGoubier';
> description: 'SmaCC Smalltalk Compiler Compiler for Pharo
> 4.0'.
> spec
> baseline: 'SmaCC' with: [ spec repository:
> 'github://ThierryGoubier/SmaCC:master' ];
> import: 'SmaCC' ]
>
> Thierry
>
>
>
> 2015-01-27 10:08 GMT+01:00 kilon alios <kilon.al...@gmail.com>:
>
>> So I have a Configuration in the Meta repo of pharo 4 and 3 that loads
>> the latest version of my project Ephestos.
>>
>> However I have moved my development to github since I am very happy with
>> the workflow and since I discovered loading github repos via a baseline I
>> have little use for smalltalkhub.
>>
>> So my plan is this, keep the configuration in the meta repo so people and
>> me can install my project easily with one click via the wonderful simple
>> configuration browser , but I dont want anymore to load any versions with
>> it. Instead I want to tell the configuration "load the github baseline"
>> which means it will fetch the code from my github account master branch
>> which is the stable branch anyway (and the only branch so far) .
>>
>> That will allow me to never have to update that configuration again since
>> it will just load the latest code from github repo.
>>
>> The question is how to do this the easiest and cleanest way possible ?
>>
>
>
