> On Jan 22, 2015, at 9:02 PM, off...@riseup.net wrote: > > Trying to listen the community __before__ tracing the goals for SRP is my > main message here. A more "etnographer" approach instead of the "saleman" > one, if I can make the analogy.
This is good advice. Also Ben’s. Richard that attitude you had in this thread is making your campaign more interesting, I’m looking forward to what comes after these reflections. About the fragmentation we have, it’s true. I think is a "necessary evil” to get things done in each dialect/framework/artefact. If we somehow could make easy to keep (sub)communities connected, friends, we might be able to capitalize on Metcalfe’s law <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metcalfe's_law> in everybody’s favor. And for me too it was the case of a friend that repeatedly cared to show me how the whole development cycle in smalltalk was “different” and interesting. So friend sounds like a strategic word to make things better
