ok thank you for taking it the time explaining things. I will figure this out myself.
On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 3:46 PM, Johan Fabry <jfa...@dcc.uchile.cl> wrote: > This is my last mail to the thread as we are going around in circles. > > > "I focused on you splitting up into methods because that was a complaint > of yours and you said you were following Spec examples when doing that." > > > > But I think I have been crystal clear about this my main issues were 2 > > And you also said that you had a class with 36 methods and you were > clearly upset about it. There were three exclamation marks. > > > 2) I have to return each spec element which makes sense to me but what > annoys me is that I have to do it verbosely by returning each variable > separately in its own method. Instead inside a single method and pass it as > an array which would reduce the amount of methods used dramatically. > > These methods are called accessors. Please use the conventional > terminology so that we can better understand each other. You were talking > about the names of the spec elements before and that was very confusing > (and you never cleared it up). > > As I said in a previous mail, you don’t write accessors by hand, you > generate them. Try in Nautilus: click on a class name, right click for the > menu, Refactoring->Class Refactoring->Generate accesors. Or cmd-h-a. It > will propose a list of accessors to generate for you. > > > > ---> Save our in-boxes! http://emailcharter.org <--- > > Johan Fabry - http://pleiad.cl/~jfabry > PLEIAD lab - Computer Science Department (DCC) - University of Chile > > >
