Kilon, You did start with converting PBE, right ? What is the current status ? I kind of liked the git book. And it is badly needed, indeed.
Sven > On 07 Nov 2014, at 13:56, kilon alios <kilon.al...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Stef I did not meant it as offence, of course you do great amount of work for > documentation. But I cannot ignore the fact that PBE is still stuck to 1.4, > that there is no documentation for Pharo Morphic and most libraries if not > all are partly documented."lacks documentation" does not mean that there is > no documentation. I meant exactly what I typed. > > Stef you guys do an amazing job and I am proud to be a member of the Pharo > community and make my own small contributions to make Pharo more popular and > better. > > On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 2:27 PM, stepharo <steph...@free.fr> wrote: > > On 4/11/14 13:53, kilon alios wrote: >> I have welcomed Amber with open arms, but I have failed miserably to wrap my >> head around it. >> >> Is ironic if you think about, Pharo really lacks documentation even in basic >> areas, > Are you joking? I spend my time writing books and chapters and their quality > is quite good. >> libraries are nowhere near as powerful as those offered by javascript yet I >> have found Pharo way easier to use. Web development looks to me like a big >> pile of unnecessary mess. Actually Amber is the best part of it :D >> >> So the problem for me is not so much the System Browser , but the steep >> learning curve . Or maybe its just the fact that I dont like many of the web >> frameworkds, including html / js / css etc. >> >> I wish I could make something in pharo and click a button to deploy it as a >> website but alas thats just a dream. > > I would like to have a solution for that without having a smalltalk compiler > in JS as amber is doing. >> I think however that for the amount of developers Amber has been making some >> amazing progress. >> >> >> >> On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 4:55 AM, Pierce Ng <pie...@samadhiweb.com> wrote: >> On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 10:21:18PM +0200, kilon alios wrote: >> > Even though I always have been a supporter of Amber the IDE has still a >> > very long way to go. >> >> I've been meaning to build a code browser for Amber (and GST) in Pharo with >> Omnibrowser using the Shampoo protocol[1], once I get some copious spare >> time. >> >> [1] http://dmitrymatveev.co.uk/shampoo >> >> Pierce >> >> > >
