Re: [Pharo-users] About Zinc http components

[stepharo]

It would be really interesting to get a binding for Pharo.

Stef

On 7/10/14 23:51, kilon alios wrote:

nope but it is made (unlike 0mq which is made in C++) in C so its should be relative simple to wrap with NB or even TalkFFI. At least the parts that interest you.

On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 11:56 PM, Alain Rastoul <alf.mmm....@gmail.com <mailto:alf.mmm....@gmail.com>> wrote:

    Nanosg looks interesting too, thank you Kilon, I will look at it
    closer too.
    Do you known some working bindings with pharo ?

    Alain
    Le 07/10/2014 21:12, kilon alios a écrit :

        there is nanomsg which is a rethinking on 0mq and from same
        developers,
        its MIT licensed --> http://nanomsg.org/index.html

        On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 9:12 PM, Alain Rastoul
        <alf.mmm....@gmail.com <mailto:alf.mmm....@gmail.com>
        <mailto:alf.mmm....@gmail.com <mailto:alf.mmm....@gmail.com>>>
        wrote:

            Thanks you for your answers.

            0mq looks great, but released with LGPL licence, and I
        don't like
            that (I don't
            understand why there is also a GPL licence file in the
        distribution
            ? - clearly a *noway*),
            I prefer a full smalltalk implementation I can debug when
        things go
            wrong.
            I think latency and timing problems would be the same, no big
            difference in performance.
            BTW knowing about this library is cool and may be of some
        help (who
            knows),
            thank you Marten for the reference.

            I agree totally with you Sven about performance and standards.
            And I also agree with you about reusing someone else's
        work ...
            I don't like to reinvent the wheel, especially a good
        wheel when
            mine would be worst,
            I would if I were a wheel specialist -  clearly not the
        case here.

            Much (if not all) of what I found on the web about
        WebSocket is
            about a browser/server connection
            and does not talk about use in a server/server connection,
        hence my
            question.
            But you answered it, and your answer is ok with my thoughts
              (plus using Zn components is a breeze)

            Thanks again

            regards,

            Alain
            Le 07/10/2014 18:26, Paul DeBruicker a écrit :

                marten wrote

                    There are some good C libraries out there, which
        are suitable to
                    connect programs with each other: a good example
        is 0MQ.

                    Marten

                    --
                    Marten Feldtmann



                Hi Marten,


                Is your 0mq library posted somewhere and MIT licensed?

                Thanks

                Paul



                --
                View this message in context:
        
http://forum.world.st/About-__Zinc-http-components-__tp4783071p4783223.html

<http://forum.world.st/About-Zinc-http-components-tp4783071p4783223.html>

                Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list
        archive at
                Nabble.com.