It is :) Doru
On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 8:28 PM, Trygve Reenskaug <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks. Looks like a powerful improvement. --Trygve > > > On 21.09.2014 19:34, Tudor Girba wrote: > > Class categories are system categories :). > > Since Pharo 3.0, they are replaced with RPackage. They are still around > at the moment as a backup system, but almost everything in the image should > now work through RPackage. The difference between the two is that while > system categories are awkward strings, RPackages are explicit objects. > > To learn more, you can inspect for example: > RPackageOrganizer default packages > > Cheers, > Doru > > On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 5:33 PM, Trygve Reenskaug <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Doru, >> "*Now pay attention class categories will not exist in the future.*" >> I already know about system categories (categories of classes) and method >> categories within a class. >> I understood you to mean system categories. >> What are class categories and why will they be removed? >> --Trygve >> >> >> >> On 21.09.2014 15:36, Tudor Girba wrote: >> >> What do you mean? >> >> Doru >> >> On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 2:42 PM, Trygve Reenskaug <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> On 20.09.2014 14:51, stepharo wrote: >>> >>> This is cool I blog about it. >>> Now pay attention class categories will not exist in the future. >>> >>> Stef >>> >>> Any ref to this development? >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> www.tudorgirba.com >> >> "Every thing has its own flow" >> >> >> > > > -- > www.tudorgirba.com > > "Every thing has its own flow" > > > -- > > Trygve Reenskaug mailto: [email protected] > Morgedalsvn. 5A http://folk.uio.no/trygver/ > N-0378 Oslo http://fullOO.info > Norway Tel: (+47) 22 49 57 27 > -- www.tudorgirba.com "Every thing has its own flow"
