Hi. Do you think Roassal can replace Morphic at all?
2014-09-16 20:07 GMT+04:00 Alexandre Bergel <alexandre.ber...@me.com>: > In the word “submorph” there are two important parts. “sub” and “morph”. > Roassal support subelements, but only one morph is around, the trachel > morph that contains all the drawing. > Why staying in Morphic? Morphic does not scale well, does not have layout, > and morphs are hardly composable with other morphs :-) > > Cheers, > Alexandre > > > On Sep 16, 2014, at 7:13 AM, Sean P. DeNigris <s...@clipperadams.com> > wrote: > > > On Sep 15, 2014, at 9:54 PM, "abergel [via Smalltalk]" <[hidden email]> > wrote: > > > Can you describe a bit more what you need? In Roassal, you do not have > submorph, but do you really need them? > > Yes, I want to create a Self-like world that is also zoomable, so you > could say the whole purpose is to have submorphs ;) > > Cheers, > > Sean > > > > View this message in context: Re: Zoomable & Infinitely scrollable > PasteupMorph > > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > -- > _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: > Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu > ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. > > > > >
