On 09 Apr 2014, at 00:16, Esteban A. Maringolo <emaring...@gmail.com> wrote:
> From my standpoint GLORP is abandoned in the Pharo realm. > There are some people, like me, that still use it, but no one maintains it. > It worries me that not a single person ran into this issue before, > during the whole testing of Pharo 3. Well... I am now, but I'd expect > more people using GLORP. No, it is not abandoned. See http://dbxtalk.smallworks.com.ar http://forum.world.st/dbxtalk-working-on-pharo-3-0-td4743313.html Cache was added recently to Pharo 3. But your remarks about porting and namespaces is correct. Maintaining something across multiple Smalltalk implementations is very hard. Sven
