On 09 Apr 2014, at 03:31, Esteban A. Maringolo <emaring...@gmail.com> wrote:
> OpenDBX aside (which I don't plan to use), I don't see how this will > get GLORP running :) It is maintained as part of DBXTalk, as far as I understand http://www.smalltalkhub.com/#!/~DBXTalk/Glorp/ and yes that is a bit confusing, but you can't do much with Glorp unless you can talk to a database, so it makes some sense. > Should I rename Pharo's Cache to something else, like "PharoCache" or > "AbstractCache"? Well, to get the code to load, that would be a dirty hack that could work. But IMO we should rename Glorp's Cache to InstancesCache, it is only referred to via CacheManager. Sven
