Camillo, you're correct, the slide should contain "configuration;". When added, 
the load is successful, thanks.
Now I'm stuck on trying to load Xpath for slide 74
data := 'http://picasaweb.google.com/data/feed/api/all?q=puppy' asUrl 
retrieveContents. doc := XMLDOMParser parse: data. path := XPath for: 
'entry/content/@src'. urls := path in: doc. url := urls anyOne. 
Debugger shows
'Unable to resolve ConfigurationOfXPath'
Thanks again, Steve


From: stephane.duca...@inria.fr
Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2013 22:40:50 +0200
To: pharo-users@lists.pharo.org
Subject: Re: [Pharo-users] The Pharo Advantage: what is it for you?


On Sep 6, 2013, at 10:16 PM, S. Garth Holland <steve9571...@hotmail.com> 
wrote:Hello, I'm new to this list.
Hello and welcome
Let us know if you get more questions. 
Stef

I tried one of the examples in 
http://www.slideshare.net/pharoproject/pharo-tutorial-at-ecooptutorial 
Slide 70. Gofer new smalltalkhubUser: 'PharoExtras' project: 'XMLParser'; 
loadStable.
The debugger pops up with the message 'Could not find a valid 
ConfigurationReference'
Any suggestions on why this happened?
Thank you, Steve
OS: windows 7 64 bit.
Using path: C:\Dev\Smalltalk\Pharo\Pharo2.0-win\Pharo2.0 
=============================================
phil at highoctane.be wrote: > Hello, > > As part of the defense of a budget 
and technology choices, what would you > guys list as a key advantage of using 
Pharo for creating software solutions? > > My current stack is: > > Pharo 2.0 > 
Seaside 3 (including Seaside-REST) > Magritte 3 >Twitter Bootstrap > > + a 
couple of data storage stuff (DBXTalk, Phriak, Voyage) > + STOMP > > + Amber if 
needed > > I've been test driving the whole stack for a while and even if there 
are > some quirks, it looks like good enough for what I want to achieve. > > 
Now, my question: what is the Pharo advantage you would put forward vs > other 
choices (like LAMP, Java, Rails etc). > > I am aware of what those could be but 
I am more looking for what makes you > tick when using the technology (like: 
"it is fun to work with", "no more > Java for me, due to ...", "speeds dev time 
by ...", "not> NSA-backdoor-enabled") > > This is the kind of thing we should 
have in stock for helping the > Consortium members get buy in from people 
giving a yes on budgets. > > Thanks in advance for your help! (BTW, I am going 
to use this on monday > morning for defending our position on a significant 
project). > > Phil > > Yesterday I came across this very nice Pharo tutorial 
[1] by Damien & Camille. Some slides I think that relate are: * 47-49 syntax 
comparisons to another typical language * 72-75 easy web interaction * 80 
serializing continuations / exception context (this is massively impressive!) * 
81 powerful breakpoints 
[1]http://www.slideshare.net/pharoproject/pharo-tutorial-at-ecooptutorialcheers 
-ben
                                          

Reply via email to