It seems like you missed some code, can you try the following?
Gofer new
smalltalkhubUser: 'PharoExtras' project: 'XMLParser';
configuration;
loadStable.I am not sure if your code ever worked in Pharo 2.0. On 2013-09-06, at 17:16, "S. Garth Holland" <steve9571...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > Hello, I'm new to this list. > > > I tried one of the examples in > http://www.slideshare.net/pharoproject/pharo-tutorial-at-ecooptutorial > > Slide 70. Gofer new smalltalkhubUser: 'PharoExtras' project: 'XMLParser'; > loadStable. > > The debugger pops up with the message 'Could not find a valid > ConfigurationReference' > > Any suggestions on why this happened? > > Thank you, Steve > > OS: windows 7 64 bit. > > Using path: C:\Dev\Smalltalk\Pharo\Pharo2.0-win\Pharo2.0 > > ============================================= > > phil at highoctane.be wrote: > Hello, > > As part of the defense of a budget > and technology choices, what would you > guys list as a key advantage of > using Pharo for creating software solutions? > > My current stack is: > > > Pharo 2.0 > Seaside 3 (including Seaside-REST) > Magritte 3 >Twitter > Bootstrap > > + a couple of data storage stuff (DBXTalk, Phriak, Voyage) > + > STOMP > > + Amber if needed > > I've been test driving the whole stack for a > while and even if there are > some quirks, it looks like good enough for what > I want to achieve. > > Now, my question: what is the Pharo advantage you > would put forward vs > other choices (like LAMP, Java, Rails etc). > > I am > aware of what those could be but I am more looking for what makes you > tick > when using the technology (like: "it is fun to work with", "no more > Java > for me, due to ...", "speeds dev time by ...", "not> NSA-backdoor-enabled") > > > This is the kind of thing we should have in stock for helping the > > Consortium members get buy in from people giving a yes on budgets. > > Thanks > in advance for your help! (BTW, I am going to use this on monday > morning > for defending our position on a significant project). > > Phil > > Yesterday > I came across this very nice Pharo tutorial [1] by Damien & Camille. Some > slides I think that relate are: * 47-49 syntax comparisons to another typical > language * 72-75 easy web interaction * 80 serializing continuations / > exception context (this is massively impressive!) * 81 powerful breakpoints > [1]http://www.slideshare.net/pharoproject/pharo-tutorial-at-ecooptutorialcheers > -ben
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
