I think so. I think Stef created 10869 and I 10870. I had made the corrections and written the tests. Anyway, it is possible that I had made it bad. I thought I had commited the slice, but...
If you tell me how, I will do it again. Regards 2013/7/29 Marcus Denker <marcus.den...@inria.fr> > > On Jul 29, 2013, at 2:34 PM, José Comesaña <jose.comes...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > It was already discussed and modified: > https://pharo.fogbugz.com/default.asp?10869 > > > > This one is just an open report… no action was done. I have merged it into > Issue 11222 > > But there is a third issue about exactly the same, this I think is from > you: > > 10870 Corrections to Date class >>readFrom:pattern: > https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/10870 > > > > Regards > > > > 2013/7/24 Sabine Knöfel <sabine.knoe...@gmail.com> > > Hi, > > > > Date readFrom: '4.2.13' readStream pattern: 'd.m.yy' > > > > Does not return 4.2.2013 but 4.2.0013 > > > > The comment is saying > > "A year given using only two decimals is considered to be >2000" > > > > So, the comment is not ok or this is a bug? > > > > Sabine > > > > > > > > -- > > View this message in context: > http://forum.world.st/Bug-in-Date-readFrom-pattern-Pharo2-0-tp4700427.html > > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > > > > >
