On 24 Jul 2013, at 18:20, Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.duca...@inria.fr> wrote:
> I remember that once camillo suggested to use the same approach as in dart > where you can specify a strategy. The ZTimestamp package contains such an example-based parser/formatter (load from the config browser or from http://www.smalltalkhub.com/#!/~SvenVanCaekenberghe/Neo) that can do what you want and much more, like multi-language weeks/months, for formatting & parsing. ((ZTimestampFormat fromString: '3.2.01') createDate; parse: '4.2.13') = (Date newDay: 4 month: 2 year: 2013 ) It is based on how things are done in Go. Read the class docs & tests for more information. You could subclass ZTimestampFormat and override #parseYearTwoDigitsFrom: to fine-tune the behaviour of 2 digit year specifications. Sven >> I agree >> >> The comment of yyyymmdd is saying >> "Format the date in ISO 8601 standard like '2002-10-22' >> The result is of fixed size 10 characters long.." >> >> so I would say the selector is not choosen very careful. >> >> There is a discussion in Fogbuz about >>readFrom:pattern: >> https://pharo.fogbugz.com/default.asp?11222 >> >> Sabine >> >> On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 2:56 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck [via Smalltalk] >> <[hidden email]> wrote: >> >> > I also hate #yyyymmdd >> > >> > Date today yyyymmdd -> '2013-07-24' >> > >> > I would expect '20130724' >> > >> > Cheers, >> > >> > >> > On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 5:59 AM, Sabine Knöfel <[hidden email]> wrote: >> >> >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> I created a bug, hoping that I filled out every field correctly. >> >> >> >> >> >> https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/11222/Date-readFrom-pattern-year-2-decimals-not-20xx-but-00xx >> >> >> >> Sabine >> >> >> >> On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 9:52 AM, Stéphane Ducasse [via Smalltalk] >> >> <[hidden email]> wrote: >> >> >> >> > Hello Sabine >> >> > probably a bug. >> >> > If you can write some tests and publish them on the bugtracker this >> >> > will >> >> > help. >> >> > If you provide the fix (it will be faster to get it fixed) please run >> >> > the >> >> > tests to make sure that we do not >> >> > introduce side effects. >> >> > >> >> > Stef >> >> > >> >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> >> >> Date readFrom: '4.2.13' readStream pattern: 'd.m.yy' >> >> >> >> >> >> Does not return 4.2.2013 but 4.2.0013 >> >> >> >> >> >> The comment is saying >> >> >> "A year given using only two decimals is considered to be >2000" >> >> >> >> >> >> So, the comment is not ok or this is a bug? >> >> >> >> >> >> Sabine >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> >> View this message in context: >> >> >> >> >> >> http://forum.world.st/Bug-in-Date-readFrom-pattern-Pharo2-0-tp4700427.html >> >> >> Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at >> >> >> Nabble.com. >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > ________________________________ >> >> > If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the >> >> > discussion >> >> > below: >> >> > >> >> > http://forum.world.st/Bug-in-Date-readFrom-pattern-Pharo2-0-tp4700427p4700428.html >> >> > To unsubscribe from Bug in Date>>readFrom:pattern: ? Pharo2.0, click >> >> > here. >> >> > NAML >> >> >> >> ________________________________ >> >> View this message in context: Re: Bug in Date>>readFrom:pattern: ? >> >> Pharo2.0 >> >> >> >> Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Mariano >> > http://marianopeck.wordpress.com >> > >> > >> > ________________________________ >> > If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion >> > below: >> > http://forum.world.st/Bug-in-Date-readFrom-pattern-Pharo2-0-tp4700427p4700533.html >> > To unsubscribe from Bug in Date>>readFrom:pattern: ? Pharo2.0, click here. >> > NAML >> >> View this message in context: Re: Bug in Date>>readFrom:pattern: ? Pharo2.0 >> Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >
